Site Selection Checklist and Weighted Scorecard
Compare locations consistently using fatal gates, weighted criteria and documented assumptions.
View the ResourceWhere you put the next location is one of the few business decisions you can’t iterate your way out of. A bad hire can be replaced and a bad campaign can be paused — a bad site is a five-to-ten-year lease with your name on the guaranty. Our site selection practice replaces gut feel with a scoring framework: demographics and daytime population, traffic counts and directionality, drive-time analysis, competition density and saturation, co-tenancy quality, labor availability for operations-heavy users, and cost realities across rent, buildout, and incentives.
We run site selection for three client profiles. Franchise groups and multi-unit operators rolling out across Texas get a repeatable market-entry playbook: metro prioritization, submarket scoring, and a site pipeline that keeps units opening on schedule. Single-location businesses making their most important expansion decision get institutional-grade analysis scaled to one high-stakes choice. And industrial or operational users — manufacturers, distributors, service fleets — get facility-location analysis weighted for labor sheds, logistics costs, and power availability rather than retail foot traffic.
Central Texas rewards disciplined site selection more than almost any market in the country because growth here is corridor-shaped, not uniform. The difference between a location in the path of growth — the Austin–San Antonio I-35 spine, the 183A northwest arc, the US-290 Hill Country corridor, the SH-130 eastern arc — and a location the growth already passed is measured in years of revenue.
Every engagement ends the same way: a ranked, documented recommendation you can defend to partners, franchisors, and lenders — followed, when you’re ready, by the leasing or acquisition execution to lock the site down.
A defensible process, not a hunch — and the execution muscle to close on the winning site.
What your best existing location has in common — quantified into a repeatable site template.
Metros and submarkets scored against the template; the map narrows to defensible candidates.
Specific properties evaluated, ranked, and documented — including off-market candidates.
Lease or purchase execution on the winning location, negotiated with full market leverage.
Touring starts with what’s available; site selection starts with what works. We quantify your success profile — the measurable traits your best location shares — then screen markets and score specific sites against it, including properties that aren’t publicly listed. The tours come last, and only for sites that already passed the math.
Demographics and daytime population, drive-time and trade-area analysis, traffic counts and directionality, competition density and saturation, co-tenancy quality, labor availability for operational users, and total occupancy cost including buildout. Weightings shift by concept — a med spa and a distribution fleet don’t score the same map.
Yes — our documentation is built to survive franchisor review: ranked candidates, supporting data, and the rationale in writing. Franchisees who arrive with a defensible package get approved faster and negotiate better.
Our entire footprint at once, if the rollout calls for it — Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, San Antonio, Houston, and the corridor communities between them. Multi-market operators get market prioritization first — where the concept wins soonest — then a sequenced site pipeline so openings hit schedule instead of stalling on real estate.
Tell us what your best location has in common — we’ll help you find the next one that matches it.
Use these practical guides, checklists and calculators to prepare for the next decision.
Compare locations consistently using fatal gates, weighted criteria and documented assumptions.
View the Resource →Capture comparable facts during tours and prevent presentation quality from hiding operational problems.
View the Resource →Evaluate trade area, access, feasibility, unit economics and lease risk for a coffee location.
View the Resource →Test patient access, clinical workflow, infrastructure, compliance coordination and buildout feasibility.
View the Resource →